首页> 外文OA文献 >In situ root identification through blade penetrometer testing – Part 1:interpretative models and laboratory testing
【2h】

In situ root identification through blade penetrometer testing – Part 1:interpretative models and laboratory testing

机译:通过刀片式渗透计测试进行原位根鉴定–第1部分:解释性模型和实验室测试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Root architecture and reinforcement are important parameters to measure the safety of vegetated slopes and stream banks against slope instability and erosion or to assess the stability of plants against environmental loading (e.g. windthrow of trees). However, these are difficult to measure without timeconsuming sampling or counting procedures. Previous studies proposed using a penetrometer with an adapted geometry, and showed that individual root breakages could be detected as sudden drops in penetrometer resistance. However, there are no existing models to derive root properties from the measured traces. Here, several interpretative models are developed and their performance at identifying and characterising buried acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) root analogues of varying diameter and architecture in sand are assessed. It was found that models assuming the analogues broke in bending rather than tension provided good predictions for the force–displacement behaviour. The simple analytical bending model developed here was shown to perform almost as well as more sophisticated numerical models. For all models, the predictions of additional penetrometer force required to break the root analogue were more accurate than predictions for lateral root displacement required to reach failure. The root analogue diameter and to a lesser extent the soil resistance and root angle were shown to affect the penetrometer resistance strongly. Root branching, root length and the distance between the point of load application and a root boundary (root tip or parent root) had a much smaller effect. When the root failure mechanism, root strength, root stiffness and soil resistance are known, an accurate prediction of the root diameter can be made based on the root peak resistance value identified from a blade penetration test. Penetrometer testing, a test which is easy to perform in the field, coupled with an accurate interpretative model might therefore be an effective method to rapidly quantify the spatial distribution, depths and diameters of roots.
机译:根系结构和加固是衡量植被坡和河岸抵御坡度不稳定和侵蚀的安全性或评估植物抵御环境负荷(例如树木的风吹)的稳定性的重要参数。但是,如果不进行费时的采样或计数过程,则很难进行测量。先前的研究提出使用具有合适几何形状的针入度计,并表明可以检测到单个根部断裂,因为针入度计阻力突然下降。但是,没有现有的模型可以从测得的迹线中导出根属性。在这里,开发了几种解释模型,并评估了它们在鉴定和表征沙中直径和结构不同的埋入式丙烯腈丁二烯苯乙烯(ABS)根类似物方面的性能。结果发现,假设类似物是在弯曲而不是在拉力下断裂的模型为力-位移行为提供了良好的预测。事实证明,这里开发的简单分析弯曲模型的性能几乎和更复杂的数值模型一样。对于所有模型,破坏根类似物所需的额外的渗透计力的预测比达到破坏所需的横向根位移的预测更为准确。根部模拟物的直径以及较小程度上的土壤阻力和根部角度显示出对渗透仪阻力的强烈影响。根分支,根长度以及施加载荷的点与根边界(根尖或父根)之间的距离的影响要小得多。如果知道根部破坏机理,根部强度,根部刚度和土壤阻力,则可以根据从叶片穿透测试中识别出的根部峰值阻力值来准确预测根部直径。因此,渗透仪测试是一种易于在现场进行的测试,再加上准确的解释模型,可能是快速量化根系的空间分布,深度和直径的有效方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号